6. Strategic disinvestment in India has been guided by the basic economic principle that the government should not be in the business to engage itself in manufacturing/producing goods and services in sectors where competitive markets have come of age. In light of this statement, critically examine the relevance of the shift in the disinvestment policy of the government. (250 Words) (15 Marks)
APPROACH:
●Mention the recent context of strategic disinvestment in India
●List down the positives of the disinvestment policy of the government
●Highlight the concerns arising out of it.
ANSWER: Recently, the Union Finance Minister announced the formulation of a new public sector enterprise policy under which there will be at least one public sector enterprises entity in strategic sectors and those in non-strategic sectors shall be privatised.
Prospects from the policy measure:
● Economic Survey says public sector units performed better than peers after privatisation of such units.
● For example, Survey noted that recent approval of strategic disinvestment in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd led to an increase in value of shareholders’ equity of the oil marketing company by Rs 33,000 crore when compared to its peer Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
● Disinvestment of Public Sector Enterprises allows rise of non tax revenues for the government to meet its fiscal consolidation targets. It is necessary to keep in check the targets under FRBM Act and NK Singh Committee recommendations.
● Privatisation can bring in higher profitability, promote efficiency, increase competitiveness and promote professionalism in management in CPSEs.
● Privatized enterprises provide better and prompt services to the customers and help in improving the overall economic growth of the country.
●Private sector focuses more on profit maximization and less on social objectives unlike the public sector that initiates socially viable adjustments in case of emergencies and criticalities.
● Privatisation compromises stable long term macro-economic structural adjustment for the sake of temporary gain of non tax revenues.
● Profit-making PSEs need not be disinvested as they provide a source of permanent and regular income for government exchequer. Eg: Disinvestment of BPCL even though it is one of the most profitable PSUs.
● Employment security concerns because privatised enterprises keep profit as first priority cutting down administrative costs. Eg: Protests by Air India employees.
Case Study: Kerala State Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (KSDP), reportedly the only state government-run pharmaceutical PSE in India which was running into losses was transformed to become profitable last year. It is expected to supply drugs that are used in the post-organ transplant treatment at Rs 28 for a day as compared to Rs 250 for the day by other companies. The existence of such PSUs is helpful, especially in the current scenario.
Thus, it is viable to develop a symbiotic relationship between competent public and private sectors to foster India’s potential as an industrial powerhouse.