ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) is a regional organization of 10 nations which was established to promote political and social stability amid rising tensions among the Asia-Pacific’s post-colonial states. Its members are Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Brunei, Myanmar, Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia.
ASEAN commands far greater influence on Asia-Pacific trade, political, and security issues than its members could achieve individually. India’s relationship with ASEAN has emerged as a key cornerstone of our foreign policy.
After its Independence in 1947, India followed a policy of Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) and became a champion of decolonisation, including in Southeast Asia.
However, during the 1970s, India’s perceived tilt towards the Soviet Union caused Southeast Asia to drift away from India as both followed different economic and political ideologies.
In a major shift away from policies of the Cold War era, India adopted the “Look East Policy” (LEP) soon after economic liberalization in 1991 to increase economic and commercial ties with East and Southeast Asian nations.
India became a Sectoral Partner of ASEAN in 1992, a Dialogue Partner in 1996 and a Summit-level Partner in 2002.
The partnership was upgraded to Strategic Partnership in 2012 as a result of the growth of India-ASEAN relationship in last two decades.
India announced Act East Policy in 2014 with an intent to upscale its engagement with ASEAN Member States.
India and ASEAN celebrated 25 years of their Dialogue Partnership, 15 years of Summit Level interaction and 5 years of Strategic Partnership in 2017.
The Act-East Policy emphasizes the 3 C’s of Connectivity, Commerce and Culture as the focus areas of action for a greater ASEAN-India integration.
Trade imbalance with RCEP members – India’s trade deficit with RCEP countries has almost doubled in the last five-six years.
Chinese Angle – From a geopolitical perspective, RCEP is China-led or is intended to expand China’s influence in Asia. India has already signed FTA with all the countries of RCEP except China.
Signing of RCEP can lead to cheaper products from China flooding the Indian market.
Lack of adequate protection for domestic industries – India’s proposals for strict Rules of Origin (to prevent routing of products from non-RCEP countries) and an Auto-trigger mechanism to impose tariffs when imports crossed a certain threshold which were not accepted.
Lack of Service component – Most developed RCEP countries where India can export services, have been unwilling to negotiate wide-ranging disciplines in services that can create new market access for trade in services in this region.
Concerns by local industries – A large number of sectors including dairy, agriculture, steel, automobiles, etc had expressed serious apprehensions on RCEP citing dominance of cheap foreign goods would dampen its business.
India’s FTA experience – India’s FTAs has generally led to greater imports than exports, giving rise to high trade deficits with FTA partners like South Korea, Japan, and ASEAN.
Protectionist image – Withdrawal from RCEP along with other recent measures like call for self-reliance under Atmanirbhar Abhiyan, etc can be perceived as India taking a protectionist stance in terms of trade policy.
Lost opportunity for India’s export sector – RCEP was envisaged to strengthen Asian supply chains, bring in investments and boost the member countries’ competitiveness in global markets.
Effect on bilateral ties with RCEP countries – There are concerns that the decision will hamper India’s bilateral trade with RCEP member countries as they would be inclined to bolster trade within the bloc.
Lost opportunity in securing a position in the post COVID world: RCEP is expected to help member countries emerge from the economic devastation caused by the pandemic through access to regional supply chains.
India’s pulling out of the RCEP deal shows the limitations of the ties with the ASEAN nations. Maintaining cordial ties, both bilaterally and multilaterally with these nations is essential for both India’s economic and security interests.
South-East Asian nations are looking at India to take on a greater role for the economic integration of the region and for ensuring an open and inclusive Indo-Pacific. Many of the members of the ASEAN perceive India as a much-needed counterbalance to China.
Failure of South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) has made India look outside South Asia towards countries of Southeast Asia for economic and political cooperation.
The ASEAN region has become strategically important for India due to its growing importance in the world politics. And for India to be a regional power as it claims to be, continuing to enhance its relations with ASEAN in all spheres must be a priority.
Indian Diaspora has an important role to play in South-East Asian countries’ economy and society. Appraise the role of Indian Diaspora in South- East Asia in this context (2017)
Enroll today with the best civils service academy in Trivandrum and take your first step towards your Civils journey .Feel free to reach out to us for any inquiries, collaborations, or support. We’re here to help.